In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2600 is much slower than the Core i9-13900KS. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $525 cheaper!
Core i7-2600
- Up to 70% cheaper – $227.36 vs $751.89
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.66 vs $5.48/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 95 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Core i9-13900KS
- Up to 121% faster in Battlefield 6 – 137 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 121% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 12 years and 3 days newer – Jan 12, 2023 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 12 years and 3 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-13900KS: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
62 FPS
45%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
45%
Price, $
$227.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.66/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
137 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
$751.89
30%
Value, $/FPS
$5.48/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600 vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2600 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KS Jan 12th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
