Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Core i7-2600
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$117.91 vs CA$470.92
- Up to 68% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700F - CA$0.69 vs CA$2.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-2600 - 217 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600 - 28 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
171
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$117.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$117.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7071 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.17/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$470.92
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$470.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7071 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2600 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |