Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Core i7-2600
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$117.91 vs CA$270.10
- Up to 48% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.37 vs CA$0.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-2600 - 383 vs 323 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
323
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$117.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$117.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$270.1
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2600 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |