Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600K.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-12600K - 482 vs 466 FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$249.00 vs CA$470.92
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-14700F - CA$0.53 vs CA$0.98 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
482
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$470.92
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$470.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6862 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
466
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6862 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |