The Core i7-14700 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-4790. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-14700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-4790
The Core i7-14700 is better in every way
Core i7-14700 vs Core i7-4790 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
182
85%
Min 1% FPS
121
86%
Price, CA$
CA$145.76
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.8/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700 vs Core i7-4790 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-14700 vs Core i7-4790 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-14700 vs Core i7-4790 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-14700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4790 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| $384.00 | MSRP | $312.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Performance | ||
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
33 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
