Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-10100 - 298 vs 267 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$130.99 vs CA$409.00
- Up to 64% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-13700F - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
298
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$409
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$130.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$130.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700F | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |