The Core i7-11700 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900 and it's also a better value for money, as it's CA$219.90 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-11700
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 32% cheaper – CA$468.98 vs CA$688.88
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i9-9900
The Core i7-11700 is better in every way
Core i7-11700 vs Core i9-9900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, CA$
CA$468.98
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.33/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
190
95%
Min 1% FPS
126
95%
Price, CA$
CA$688.88
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.62/FPS
64%
Core i7-11700 vs Core i9-9900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700 vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700 vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-11700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $423.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
