Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 19% better in Starfield than Core i5-10400F - 70 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - CA$174.99 vs CA$325.00
- Up to 36% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-11700 - CA$2.97 vs CA$4.64 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
70
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.64/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$325
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-11700 | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |