Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Core i5-9600K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$247.07 vs CA$271.20
- Up to 2% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.99 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-9600K - 269 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
249
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$247.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$247.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7256 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
269
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$271.2
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$271.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7530 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9600K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |