Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 180 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$178.10 vs CA$193.76
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-9400F - 226 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-9400F - CA$0.86 vs CA$0.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$178.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
226
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$193.76
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$193.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |