Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1491 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Core i5-8400
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$199.49 vs CA$399.17
- Up to 47% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-12900KF - CA$0.73 vs CA$1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i5-8400 - 288 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 24 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
274
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$199.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$199.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6892 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
288
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$399.17
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$399.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7166 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8400 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |