Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Core i5-7600
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$185.13 vs CA$270.73
- Up to 27% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.06 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-7600 - 187 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$185.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$185.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
73%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7600 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |