The Core i5-660 is a slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 51 vs 73 Watts
Core i5-660 vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
168
99%
Min 1% FPS
113
99%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.14
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Core i5-660 vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-660 vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-660 vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
62%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-660 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $196.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Skylake |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
