Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i5-5257U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1887 days newer than Core i5-5257U.
Advantages of Core i5-5257U
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-5257U - 181 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5257U - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 382 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-5257U | vs | Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel Iris 6100 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |