In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-4590T is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 3200G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $64 more expensive!
Core i5-4590T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 5% faster in Battlefield 6 – 68 vs 65 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs May 11, 2014
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 49% cheaper – $65.98 vs $129.94
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.97 vs $1.99/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-4590T vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
65 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
96%
Price, $
$129.94
50%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
49%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
68 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590T vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590T vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4590T May 11th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 11th, 2014 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
