The Core i5-4590 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700K, however, it's a better value for money, as it's CA$97.81 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-4590
- Up to 50% cheaper – CA$96.76 vs CA$194.57
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 84 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-6700K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i5-4590 vs Core i7-6700K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4590
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
180
96%
Min 1% FPS
120
97%
Price, CA$
CA$96.76
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, CA$
CA$194.57
49%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
51%
Core i5-4590 vs Core i7-6700K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590 vs Core i7-6700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590 vs Core i7-6700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4590 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 5th, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | $339.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
84 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |