Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3412 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 37 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4300M - 208 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$639.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$639.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4300M | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |