In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-4200U is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 3950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4200U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 15 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 3950X
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 9 3950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 9 3950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4200U vs Ryzen 9 3950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4200U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
55%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4200U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3950X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $749.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM4 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
