In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3320M is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 77% faster in Battlefield 6 – 108 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 77% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3320M vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
56%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
57%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
