Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4664 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Core i5-2500
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$63.41 vs CA$716.28
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.25 vs CA$2.60 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i5-2500 - 276 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
257
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$63.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$63.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7647 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.6/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$716.28
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$716.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7646 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |