In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-2410M is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2410M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 35 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Feb 01, 2011
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2410M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
89 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
100%
Price, $
$870.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2410M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1614
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
12035
100%
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2410M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2410M
Feb 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2410M Feb 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,399.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | TRX4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
