In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-2400S is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2400S vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
61 FPS
68%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
69%
Price, $
$184.83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2400S vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2400S vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2400S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
