Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 344 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 4% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13400F - 83 vs 80 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - CA$270.73 vs CA$409.85
- Up to 32% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-12600 - CA$3.38 vs CA$4.94 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
83
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.94/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$409.85
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$409.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
80
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12600 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |