Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$352.99 vs CA$629.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-13900KF - CA$1.23 vs CA$2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i5-12400F - 289 vs 286 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
286
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$352.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$352.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$629.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$629.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |