Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 365 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400F - 206 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - CA$271.20 vs CA$350.99
- Up to 23% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400F - CA$1.32 vs CA$1.72 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6711 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$271.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$271.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6710 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |