Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$250.00 vs CA$1099.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$0.99 vs CA$4.18 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-11600KF - 263 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
253
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.18/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600KF | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |