Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$250.00 vs CA$564.18
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.87 vs CA$1.95 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i5-11600KF - 289 vs 286 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.95/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$564.18
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600KF | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |