Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$199.24 vs CA$348.00
- Up to 30% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.45 vs CA$0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-11400F - 542 vs 442 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
442
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$199.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$199.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
542
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$348
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$348 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |