Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$138.51 vs CA$489.98
- Up to 69% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$0.79 vs CA$2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-10400F - 193 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.54/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$489.98
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$489.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |