Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$174.99 vs CA$508.73
- Up to 63% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-11900KF - CA$1.09 vs CA$2.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Halo Infinite than Core i5-10400F - 171 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 453 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.98/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$508.73
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$508.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 728 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |