Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$174.99 vs CA$229.00
- Up to 15% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.50 vs CA$0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-10400F - 385 vs 350 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
385
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$229
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$229 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |