Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Core i5-10400
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$198.51 vs CA$397.18
- Up to 43% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-12900KF - CA$1.50 vs CA$2.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10400 - 150 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 24 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$198.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$198.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.65/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$397.18
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$397.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |