In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10300H is slower than the Core i7-11700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 31% faster in Battlefield 6 – 98 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 months and 27 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 17, 2020
- Is 5 months and 27 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10300H vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10300H vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10300H vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10300H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10300H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 17th, 2020 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $298.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
