Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 926 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - CA$84.97 vs CA$244.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-12600K - CA$0.42 vs CA$0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 23% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-9100F - 249 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
249
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$244.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |