Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-11600KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-8100T is at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-11600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
195
88%
Min 1% FPS
134
89%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
151
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $237.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
