Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$68.22 vs CA$1099.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$0.51 vs CA$7.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-7100 - 150 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
134
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$68.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$68.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.33/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |