In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-7100 is slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-7100 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-7100 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-7100 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-7100
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-7100 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
51W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
