Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 2256 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Core i3-6100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - CA$95.94 vs CA$239.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-12600K - CA$0.58 vs CA$1.30 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-6100 - 185 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$95.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$95.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$239.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6100 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |