The Core i3-540 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i3-540 vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
99%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, CA$
CA$396.39
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.37/FPS
100%
Core i3-540 vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-540 vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-540 vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-540 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$133.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
73 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |