Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1887 days newer than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-5015U - 592 vs 462 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
592
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$699.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$699.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-5015U | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |