In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-5015U is slower than the Core i7-6950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 15 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-6950X
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 78 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – May 31, 2016 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-5015U vs Core i7-6950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-5015U vs Core i7-6950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-5015U vs Core i7-6950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-5015U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i7-6950X
May 31st, 2016
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-5015U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6950X May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
$275.00 | MSRP | $1,723.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
15W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
