Core i3-4150T vs Core i3-9100F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-4150T is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
191
95%
Min 1% FPS
132
95%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
