The Core i3-4130 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-7500T and it's also a worse value for money, as it's CA$3.04 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-4130
The Core i5-7500T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-7500T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 4% cheaper – CA$75.84 vs CA$78.88
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-7500T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
178
99%
Min 1% FPS
119
99%
Price, CA$
CA$78.88
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
95%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, CA$
CA$75.84
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-7500T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
54 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |