Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 2986 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Core i3-4130
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$95.36 vs CA$269.04
- Up to 59% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-12600KF - CA$0.24 vs CA$0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4130 - 467 vs 395 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
395
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$95.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$95.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
467
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |