Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-14900KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-4010U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-14900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Average FPS
183
75%
Min 1% FPS
127
77%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4010U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |