Core i3-4005U vs Core i5-10600KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-4005U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-10600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4005U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-10600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-4005U
Sep 4th, 2013
Average FPS
183
88%
Min 1% FPS
127
89%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4005U vs Core i5-10600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4005U vs Core i5-10600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4005U
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
41%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4005U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |