Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 4103 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 21% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-390M - 108 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 16 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-390M | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
