In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-350M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 3400G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $42 more expensive!
Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 69 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 32% cheaper – $88.00 vs $129.94
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.27 vs $2.06/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 5 3400G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
63 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
90%
Price, $
$129.94
67%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
62%
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
69 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $149.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
