In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3227U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
