Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$17.85 vs CA$77.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.30 vs CA$1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 27% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-3220 - 76 vs 60 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
60
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$17.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$17.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
76
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$77.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$77.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |